More than just a shift from one set of energy sources to another, the renewable energy transition will have implications that will go well beyond the power sector. Image:
A new world is emerging from the global shift to renewables, and it is poised to upend societies and economies that have been powered and shaped by fossil fuels for two centuries.
Unless the world prepares for these imminent fundamental changes, states reliant on oil rents, industries built on conventional technologies, and communities that dig or drill for fossil fuels for a living could soon face major social, economic and political disturbances, according to leading experts from the worlds of politics, energy and economics.
Speaking at a session on the geopolitics of the energy transformation at the tenth assembly of the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) in Abu Dhabi in January, experts said the transformation that renewables brought about was such that it altered the geopolitical fabric of the world, with fundamental changes for trade, politics and people.
Nations, they said, must strengthen international cooperation and align their economic strategies with the clean energy switch to steer away from the risks arising while benefiting from new opportunities.
“We are entering an age of disruption, and it is not just happening in the energy industry, but across the board,” Adnan Amin, former director-general at IRENA, told the audience. “On balance, the social and economic outcome will be beneficial to the global economy as we move into an era of low-carbon and low-cost energy, but that is not to say that it will be a smooth path.”
Falling costs of technology will not deliver the energy transformation by itself. Countries have to be willing to share the benefits of the transition. International cooperation is essential to its success.
Christine Westphal, senior research associate, German Institute for International and Security Affairs
Oil-rich states are set to be hit the hardest. These nations have accumulated considerable wealth and leveraged significant influence abroad, but once oil demand peaks, they could sink into economic crisis and face social fractures, said Daniel Scholten, associate professor at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. In Asia, such states include Brunei and Mongolia.
Weak governance and pervasive poverty further magnify such risks, in highly populous oil-rich nations to an extent that domestic turmoil could spill across national borders and cause regional instability,writes.
In conventional industries, unemployment ranks among the biggest concerns. The coal sector alone employs 9 million people globally, making it the most labour-intensive form of fossil fuel extraction, and mine shutdowns could spark social dislocation and violent protests, according to.
Another case in point is the automobile sector, which faces disruption from electric vehicles,to transform its business model. “We are beginning to see fear among some of the big players who have not anticipated this change to happen so fast,” Amin told Eco-Business on the sidelines of the event.
“If carmakers fail to keep up with the pace of change, millions of people manufacturing internal combustion engine vehicles will lose their jobs,” he continued. “This has become a major social flashpoint, and countries affected will need to be very careful about how they deal with these issues.”
New opportunities, new risks
Driven by technological advances, falling costs and global efforts to slash climate-wrecking emissions, renewables have grown at unprecedented rates over the last decade.
According to a new IRENA, clean energy has become the world’s primary source of new power capacity, outpacing all other forms of new generation put together, and covered 26 per cent of the global power mix last year.
As new opportunities and risks arise from the clean energy transition, bold decision-making is needed to steer nations in the right direction, said Amin.
Fossil fuel exporters, for instance, could avert political upheaval by diversifying their economies, while not holding on to coal mines, oil wells, power stations and pipelines for too long could save asset managers and energy firms from financial ruin.
Coaching workers to fill millions of new clean energy jobs expected to spring up across the planet in the coming years could help countries and industries to avoid mass unemployment, while adequate taxation and policies can ensure the financial burden that the clean energy switch entails is not borne disproportionately by those who can afford it the least, he told Eco-Business.
Worldwide, the clean energy sector11 million people in 2018, up from 10.3 million in 2017. As countries ramp up policy support for renewables to battle climate change, this steep rise is set to continue, offering new opportunities for those previously employed in fossil fuel sectors.
Scholten of Delft University of Technology told the audience that renewables also empowered states to spur economic development in regions previously barred from progress.
Clean energy technologies require certain minerals such as cobalt, lithium and rare earth elements for their production, he said, and as mineral demand, mineral-rich countries can benefit from the transition by becoming an important part of global value chains.
But reserves of many metals are largest in weak states with poor governance, according to environmental practices.. Most of the world’s cobalt supply, for instance, originates in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where mineral mining is mired in and destructive
Only through internationally regulated and transparent sourcing can nations tackle the issue of conflict minerals, observed Francis Fannon, assistant secretary of energy resources at the state department of the United States.
“Stakeholders must be mindful that clean energy technologies require large shovels at the beginning of their life cycle,” he said. “We must work together to ensure sound mining governance and resilient supply chains that safeguard human rights, advance environmental protection, and support local communities.”
Stakeholders must be mindful that clean energy technologies require large shovels at the beginning of their life cycle.
Francis Fannon, assistant secretary of energy resources, state department, United States
Historically, nations lacking fossil fuel resources depended on imports from others that have them. As more countries achieve energy independence by harnessing their clean energy potential, oil-exporting nations will see their global reach decline, Olafur Grimsson, former president of Iceland, told the audience.
This will reduce the ability of fossil fuel exporters to use oil and gas as geopolitical weapons to further their foreign policy goals, making political tension arising from power asymmetries less likely to occur, he said.
But, Grimsson said, not only did renewables empower states to achieve energy independence, but opportunities awaited those who tap their abundant clean energy potential to export green power to neighbouring countries, as Laos and Bhutan do.
Cross-borderpresents a solution to renewables’ intermittent and volatile energy output, but it also enables countries to foster international cooperation, Amin observed.
He said it would put nations on par with each other if energy flowed two ways and grids connected several states. This makes power trading partnerships less exclusive than traditional fossil fuel trade relations. Should conflict brew, states can import it from a variety of alternative sources, or even generate more renewable energy themselves, he noted.
In a world powered by renewables, economic success will no longer depend on fossil fuel stocks but on clean energy technology innovation, the experts observed.
A race for renewables leadership has already started, but while boosting technological research and development, it poses new threats and could ultimately result in hurtful geo-economic rivalry, warns Christine Westphal, senior research associate at German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
Today, the United States, Europe and Japan are big players in the renewables market. None of them, however, can keep up with China, which has emerged as the world’s largest producer, exporter and installer of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries and electric vehicles, according to .
If such a small number of players dominate markets, they could stifle competition and suppress innovation, making countries that do not control technologies dependent on the few that do, Westphal told the audience. Fair trading systems are needed to avoid such technology dominance, she said.
Likewise, monopolies in mineral trade threaten to smother material flows, which could ultimately slow down the renewables switch. Aby the World Trade Organisation may have dismantled China’s attempt to restrict rare earths supply to foreign buyers in 2012, but the case showed recent fears that states endowed with critical materials may use them to exert pressure on nations that lack them are not entirely unjustified.
Westphal said if short-sighted nation-first policies stand in the way of faster renewables deployment, states risked defeating the purpose of the transition: to tackle climate change.
“If the pace of the shift is slow, climate change will not be dealt with in a timely manner, leading to excessive risks and multiplying existing threats,” she said.
She added: “Falling costs of technology will not deliver the energy transformation by itself. Countries have to be willing to share the benefits of the transition. International cooperation is essential to its success.”
Thanks for reading to the end of this story!
We would be grateful if you would consider joining as a member of The EB Circle. This helps to keep our stories and resources free for all, and it also supports independent journalism dedicated to sustainable development. For a small donation of S$60 a year, your help would make such a big difference.